James J. Kilpatrick: Death of a Bigot

James J. Kilpatrick

I’ll be curious to see what the obituaries are like for James Jackson Kilpatrick, the newspaper columnist who died last night. Although his name has lost its luster in recent years, Kilpatrick was a very important figure in the 1960s and 1970s, ranking only behind William F. Buckley as the nation’s leading conservative writer. Kilpatrick was also an unabashed racist, who owed much of his fame to his willingness to attack the Civil Rights movement.


In her superb book Freedom Is Not Enough (Harvard University Press, 2006), historian Nancy MacLean provides a good summary of Kilpatrick’s politics in the 1960s:

Answering [the Civil Right march in Birmingham in 1963], James Kilpatrick, the rising star in the conservative firmament, made his movement’s premises more explicit. “This precious right to discriminate,” he argued,  ”underlines our entire political and economic system.” As for the Negro claiming the right to inclusion, why, he had sat out the whole industrial revolution. “He is still carrying the hod… still digging the ditch,” because that’s all he had bestirred himself to do. “The hell he is equal,” Kilpatrick exclaimed. “He has no right … to favored treatment in employment, promotion, or anything else.” White Americans should rise in “resentment,” he argued, against “those who demand in the name of race what they have not earned in the way of worth.” Pioneering “in-your-face” politics, Kilpatrick used the podium at a conference on the centennial of the Emancipation Proclamation to force into public discussion “inquiry into the possibility of some innate inferiority in the Negro race.” He complained that blacks were being “petted and pampered, cuddled and coddled” by “reverse racism,” an interesting line of attack, since simple equal opportunity, much less affirmative action, had not yet been accepted as public policy. Far from rendering Kilpatrick marginal, such outburst won him a lucrative platform as a national spokesman for the cause. In 1964 the Newsday syndicate hired him to write a weekly column, “A Conservative View,” soon carried by fifty newspapers. By 1970 I was appearing there times a week in 170 newspapers across the country; it’s author would be invited to dine at the Nixon White House, was featured as a writer for Nation’s Business, and was given a weekly television spot on 60 Minutes. – p. 63

By the 1970s, such open arguments for white supremacy were no longer politically acceptable. As MacLean documents, Kilpatrick’s private correspondence reveals that he was still a racist, but he had learned to hide his views. While he would no longer openly advocate white supremacist ideas, he would carry on the war by subterfuge by attacking social programs aimed at helping African-Americans:

It required steady herding by [conservative] movement leaders to keep such rank-and-file followers “above’ racism when it was racial antipathy that had attracted so many to the right in the first place, a tutoring best revealed to posterity in personal correspondence. When criticized by an annoyed segregationist for apologizing for “your former views regarding racial integration,” Kilpatrick hastened to set the “record straight”: “I did not say I was sorry for my former views on racial integration. I said, very carefully, that I was sorry I ever defended the practice of State-sanctioned segregation. There is a world of difference.  Neither did I ‘belatedly come to the conclusion that I was wrong about my former stand on equality of the races.’ As I tried to make clear, I belatedly came to the conclusion that I was wrong about my former stand on the rightness of State-sanctioned discrimination.” (p. 257)

 Later in life, Kilpatrick would often use the language of colour-blindness to attack affirmative action. Given his past and his private views, it was difficult to give credence to the honesty of his position.

In a more rational world, Kilpatrick’s death would be an occasion for an important and necessary debate about the role of race in American politics, about the centrality of racial resentment to the conservative movement of the 1950s and 1960s, about the way that racists like Kilpatrick were allowed to whitewash their past and downplay their role as advocates of segregation, about the curious role of the many newspaper editors and television producers who gave Kilpatrick venues for spreading his racial ideas. Unfortunately, the world is not as rational as it should be, and I expect to see many mealy-mouthed obituaries about how Kilpatrick was a sweet old man who might have had a few wrong-headed ideas when young but who grew wiser with age. In fact, Kilpatrick never genuinely repented his racism, and until his legacy is described accurately there will be no full reckoning with the past.

15 thoughts on “James J. Kilpatrick: Death of a Bigot

  1. Wow, I’m 25 and hadn’t really heard (much) about this guy before. This is gross! Really seems similar to some conservative battle strategies today, although in his case, his explicit racism is on the record! You don’t find big long quotes like that from Bill O. Reilly or Jim Demint (or DO you?) but you figure that the same kind of feelings and logic are part of them.

  2. bigot
    n : a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions
    differing from his own.

    Anyone who had the pleasure of watching his head-to-heads with Von Hoffman, Alexander and others would question your use of this term in his case. Intolerant? He welcomed any opportunity to mix it up with polemicists of divergent views – the bigger the better.

    He was often on the wrong side, but contrary to the definition, Kilpatric’s views changed substantially. After retracting many of his earlier statements, he very publically and sincerely disclaimed them and repented their lasting effects.

    “Sweet old man”? Hardly, I suspect, but as a young man I found him to be a man of great personal warmth. Most of his political and journalistic adversaries came to the same conclusion years ago.

  3. He was a visionary and saw past emotions of the time. Specifically, in the 1980’s I (who am white) was told, regarding a new job in my department at work, “Don’t bother to apply. You’re not qualified. The job can only be filled by a black person.” That’s the “precious right to discriminate” he was referring to. Just as a black person doesn’t appreciate being blown off for being black, I didn’t appreciate being told to get lost because I was white. Do I think Affirmative Action is wrong? Do I agree with Kilpatrick about that? HELL YES.

  4. Sans,

    Thanks for this. It always irked me that the Sun-Times paid such a beast for the world’s dumbest On Writing column, where he would yatter on about misplaced prepositions and such.

    And Ann, you should know that’s an old management trick — when you’ve got an employee who you don’t believe is qualified for a position she covets, you have someone tell her “you can’t get that spot — you’re white.” Classic that you fell for it. You end up thinking your boss had to choose someone else, so you vent your frustration on black people.

  5. Jack Kilpatrick was editor of the editorial pages at the now defunct Richmond News Leader during my earliest days there. Regardless of his positions, he was the best writer I ever read in any part of the news business. He should be read and studied today for that reason alone. Robert P. Hilldrup

  6. Reading the involvement of Kilpatrick in the role of school segregation gives us a firsthand view of why so many whites today, simply can’t come to grips with thee roots of racism in their culture. This demonic spawn has hamstrung millions of folks in a cycle of denial, and some come here and continue to embrace it. Very telling, yet tragically revolting.

    1. Long before he died, Kilpo expressed deep regret for many of his positions on race.
      I am sorry you seem to be unaware of this fact.

      1. @Robert P. Hilldrup. As I document in the post above, the “regrets” Kilpatrick expressed were purely strategic. He knew it was no longer socially acceptable to advocate white supremacy but there is no reason to think he changed his mind that white supremacy was a good thing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s